Iraqi unions: a new beginning

I was recently invited to attend the general conference of the International Federation of Workers Education Associations (IFWEA), which was held in Albufeira, Portugal in early October. I knew what the highlight of my two days at the conference was going to be — and I was sure it wasn’t going to be the plenary sessions or workshops. The highlight would be meeting Abdullah.


Abdullah and I had exchanged a couple of email messages and when we each learned that the other would be guests of IFWEA, we arranged to meet up.
Abdullah, you see, is the representative of the new, independent Iraqi trade unions. And I was meeting him the day before he returned to Baghdad for the first time in a quarter century.
We discussed business of course — how the new Iraqi unions could use the new information technology, and LabourStart in particular, to achieve their goals. We discussed the possibility of an exciting international campaign, using the Internet, to pressure the coalition governing authority to release the assets (including buildings) that belonged to the former regime’s state controlled ‘unions’.
For me, it was an introductory course in Iraqi trade unionism. I knew that under the Saddam regime there had been a state-controlled ‘trade union’ — but this was no more a real union than, say, the All China Federation of Trade Unions, which though it claims to be the largest union in the world is actually nothing of the sort. But I knew nothing of what had happened since Saddam’s regime fell.
It turned out that with collapse of the Ba’athist regime, the official ‘unions’ collapsed as well — and two distinctly different movements stepped into the breach. One, the Iraqi Federation of Trade Unions (IFTU) was the one Abdullah represents. Another is a union of unemployed workers, one which has gotten a lot of press attention in the far-Left press, at least here in Britain. There are even remnants of the Saddamist unions, the former GFTU, though Abdullah sees them more as gangsters than a rival trade union movement. Indeed the IFTU refers to the Saddamists as a “yellow union”.
The IFTU was officially formed following a meeting attended by some 400 people at the headquarters of the transport union in Baghdad in May. It lists its goals as the following:
* workers rights;
* a new democratic trade union movement actively involved in influencing economic and social policies and rebuilding civil society, together with other social movements;
* the increased role of women at all levels within unions and civil society;
* cooperation with international and regional labour movements, and also to seek their help and cooperation to equip Iraqi working people with new skills and knowledge;
* special attention to social and economic needs of disabled people (of which there are many after Saddam?s war).
The IFTU held its first press conference in late August. It began by condemning the vicious terrorist attack on the United Nations headquarters in Baghdad. Earlier in the month, it organized a series of protests in Basra and its representatives met with the British authorities there.
IFTU now includes the following unions: the Oil and Gas Union, the Railway Union, the Vegetable Oil and Food Staff Union, the Transport Union, the Textile Union, the Leather Products Union, the Construction and Carpentry Union, the Transport and Communication Union, the Electrician and Municipalities Union, the Printing Union, the Mechanics? Union, the Service Industry Union, and the Agriculture and Irrigation Workers Union.
It has managed to establish contact with the closest neighboring trade union center — the Syrian unions — and sent a mission to Damascus to meet with them. (That’s not the one I would have picked, as Syria’s unions are no more independent nor real than the Saddamist unions. But the IFTU, like the new governing council in Baghdad, is looking for legitimacy in the Arab world.) It will also be involved in a new initiative launched by several workers education associations in Arab countries, including the Democracy and Workers Rights Center in Palestine.
Facing an estimated seven million unemployed, a collapsed economy, and the need to build up a new society from scratch, the Iraqi unions face enormous challenges. They will be needing the help and support of trade unionists everywhere.
Full coverage of their struggle is featured on LabourStart, here: http://www.labourstart.org/iraq

16 Comments on "Iraqi unions: a new beginning"

  1. THis is a really interesting piece, Eric. I’d like to mention it on my blog, but is it possible for me to link to the specific article as opposed to the overal blog?

  2. Roseanna Walker | 24/10/2003 at 16:31 |

    I read with great interest, your article on the unions in Iraq. Like so many who were opposed to a war in the first place & pained by the continuing chaos since, I will be very interested to read about the progress of people in Iraq in rebuilding all aspects of their society.
    Thank you very much & look forward to more well informed articles.

  3. John Gray | 24/10/2003 at 17:52 |

    is there any British based organisation that “supports” the “IFTU”? – if so how can you contact them?

  4. Ed Beechert | 24/10/2003 at 21:01 |

    Mr Lee:
    Is there any movement among journalists and writers to organize? What is hap[pening with the academic sector, especially higher education?
    Thanks for an interesting report.
    Ed Beechert

  5. Bill Ronksley | 25/10/2003 at 12:39 |

    Abdullah Muhsin Addressed the September Delegate Meeting of the Sheffield Trades Union Council. Details of same may be obtained from Labour Net
    (Anti-War). The Sheffield Trades Union Council would like to build links with the Iraqi Trade Union Movement.
    Yours fraternally,
    Bill Ronksley,
    Sheffield TUC Secretary.

  6. John Morgan-Evans | 26/10/2003 at 09:38 |

    Eric
    This is an very interesting piece of infomation. Would it be OK with you of I based a magazine article on it and quoted/credited you? I work for the FPA section of Amicus

  7. Abbas Mohammadi | 26/10/2003 at 16:58 |

    Hi dear Eric!
    Thank you for sharing memo of meeting Abdollah, union representative from Iraq, with us. It must have been very exciting. I wish I was there too.
    In your note you mentioned another union, Union of Unemployed in Iraq and You mentioned that they have been in the far left press. Is it possible for you to let us know what their demands are and what are they proposing. What is their posin o the occupation? Do they have a constitution?
    Unemployment must be a major issue in the period of massive destruction and the bombing. What Abdoolah said their solution for the unemployed workers in Iraq was? Did he tell you what kind of relation between the 2 unions was stablished? Thanks for you effort.
    In solidarity,
    Abbas Mohammadi,
    International solidarity chair
    for the Victoria labour council.

  8. Greg Jones | 27/10/2003 at 05:53 |

    Being a Union Carpenter in South Bend, Indiana U.S. it is great to see union activity in Iraq. I wonder if, since one of the Unions mentioned affiliated with the IFTU was a Carpenter Union, it would be possible to join with them in some supportive way. Our local in South Bend has two members in Iraq right now with the military. I don’t know what leeway they have as soldiers. It may be beneficial to let them know that there is a budding Union movement there.
    Solidarity,
    Greg Jones
    Journeylevel Carpenter

  9. Alex Gordon | 28/10/2003 at 10:33 |

    Eric,
    Thanks for the report of your meeting with Abdullah. On behalf of my union, the National Union of Rail, Maritime & Transport Workers (RMT), I recently returned from a delegation of British trade unionists which visited Baghdad together with Abdullah from 4th – 9th October this year. The purpose of our visit was to meet representatives of the new emerging democratic trade unions in Iraq. We met with the Executive Committee and many members of the Iraqi Federation of Trade Unions (IFTU) and were able to undertake several workplace visits to an Engineering Factory, Baghdad Central Railway Workshops, Al-Dhawra Oil Refinery, Fire Stations and Baghdad University where we met elected representatives of the new trade union committees and were taken around the shopfloor to meet Iraqi workers and students.
    The problems they face are immense; between 50%-70% unemployment; rampant inflation; a deteriorating security situation; infrastructure in ruins; not to mention the illegal occupation of their country by the US/UK who are busy trying to impose a neo-liberal economic agenda which no Iraqi ever voted for.
    However, Iraqi trade unionists are organising at a tremendous pace and are asserting their
    rights and their interests. In the Baghdad Bicycle Factory, for example they held a one-day strike on 27th September and raised their wages from 17,000 to 60,000 Iraqi Dinar a month (about

  10. Gino Govender | 29/10/2003 at 12:08 |

    The Iraq under the Baath Party did not ratified ILO Convention 87 on Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right to Organise. The ICEM (www.icem.org) welcomes efforts to rebuild the Iraqi labour movement and wish our sisters and brother all the success in this long march. We are on stand by to assist in any way we can.
    Gino Govender, Mines and Energy Officer

  11. George Krikas | 03/11/2003 at 09:17 |

    Could you please send us the e-mail of the ICFTU ?
    Thanks
    G. krikas

  12. http://www.laborradio.org/audio/headlines/realaudio/winsheadlines.ram
    LISTEN TO THIS UPDATE. NOW, TELL ME DUBYA IS CIRCUMVENTING THE INTERNATIONAL RIGHT TO JOIN AND FORM UNIONS IN THE NAME OF FIGHTING TERRORISM.

  13. Arieh Lebowitz | 17/11/2003 at 22:37 |

    G. Krikas asked for the e-mail of the ICFTU.
    Hey, look at their website: http://www.icftu.org

  14. Phil Doyle | 10/12/2003 at 05:44 |

    From Labor.net in Sydney, Australia
    We have just received an urgent appeal from the Iraqi Federation of Trade Unions which we feel needs to be passed on to the largest possible number of trade unionists in the next several days.
    On Saturday, dozens of US troops in ten armoured cars raided the IFTU temporary headquarters in Baghdad, smashing windows, seizing documents, and even tearing down posters and banners condemning terrorism. Eight IFTU leaders were arrested, but were released the following day, unharmed.
    No reason or explanation was given for the raid.
    The IFTU is calling on President Bush to conduct a full investigation of the raid and to ensure that it will not be repeated. The United States must respect the right of workers under international law to have free and independent trade unions.
    Please visit this page and send on your protest to the White House today:
    http://www.labourstart.org/cgi-bin/solidarityforever/show_campaign.cgi?c=22

  15. Janet Burstall | 04/03/2004 at 02:17 |

    I am particulalry interested to understand more about the differences between the IFTU and the UUI, also the General Federation of Workers Councils and Unions in Iraq (GFWCUI), to which the UUI is affiliated, along with some other unions. I have heard suggestions from UUI supporters that the IFTU is a top-down organisation, but Alex Gordon’s report contradicts that. Does anyone know where initiatives are coming from to affiliate to the IFTU, and what sort of workplace organsing generally precedes affiliation? What are the demands of the IFTU, and the GFWCUI?
    I know that the IFTU initiative is led by the CP of Iraq, which has a position on the Governing Council. Is there any evidence that this has in any way compromised the independence of the IFTU? For example, does the IFTU defy the ban on public sector unionism carried over from Saddam? Once again Alex Gordon’s report suggests “yes” they do defy that ban. What are the policies of the IFTU and the GFWCUI in relation to the Governing Council, the CPA and secularism?
    I ask these questions in the spirit of looking for a basis for unity between the 2 union federations. It seems that there are enough similarities (despite obvious differences) between the threat of right-wing militant Islamism in Iraq today, and the threat of fascism in Germany in the early 1930s – that it could be a catastrophic tragedy for the wokting class and the people of Iraq if a basis for unity against the threat of political Islam and for workers’ rights could not be achieved in Iraq.
    There will be a forum in Sydney Australia, on Saturday 20 March, to discuss solidarity with workers and women in Iraq. There will be reresentatives of the UUI, CPI, and Organisation of Womens’ Freedom in Iraq, as well as 2 local trade unionists, and a Greens MP. It would be really helpful if anyone were able to shed some light on these questions before that meeting.
    Thanks
    Janet

Comments are closed.