{"id":512,"date":"2011-10-29T13:05:00","date_gmt":"2011-10-29T12:05:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.ericlee.info\/blog\/?p=512"},"modified":"2011-10-29T13:05:00","modified_gmt":"2011-10-29T12:05:00","slug":"measuring-union-klout-online","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.ericlee.info\/blog\/measuring-union-klout-online\/","title":{"rendered":"Measuring union &#8220;klout&#8221; online"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>It&#8217;s a corporate dream come true: imagine if a company could find out exactly which customers &#8211; and potential customers &#8211; could influence others.  If one could identify with precision those consumers who influence others in their buying decisions, one could make a fortune.<\/p>\n<p>That&#8217;s the reasoning behind a number of new web-based projects that are basically watching all of us online, seeing what we do on Twitter and Facebook, and attempting to measure our influence. <\/p>\n<p>These sites then find companies interested in knowing who are the &#8220;influencers&#8221; so they can tempt them with free samples and other perks.<\/p>\n<p>But, as if often the case on the net, what was intended for one purpose can be used for an entirely different one.<\/p>\n<p>Take, for example, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.klout.com\">Klout<\/a>.  Measuring our activity on Twitter, Facebook Linked In and other social networks, it rates every user on a scale from 0 to 100.  The average rating, they say, is about 20.  Super-famous celebrities can make it into the 80s or 90s.<\/p>\n<p>Klout claims to measure &#8220;true reach&#8221; (how many people you influence), &#8220;amplification&#8221; (how much you influence them) and &#8220;network impact&#8221; (the influence of your network).<\/p>\n<p>So, how are trade unions doing?<\/p>\n<p>Oddly enough, not badly.<\/p>\n<p>Topping the list of a random selection of a couple of dozen major unions are three based in the USA &#8212; the AFL-CIO (the American TUC), the Service Employees International Union, and Working America &#8211; an innovative community organizing project of the AFL-CIO.  Those three are rated 70, 67 and 66.<\/p>\n<p>But just below them are two British unions &#8212; UNISON with 62 followed by PCS with 61.  Unite is not far behind with 58.  These are quite high numbers.<\/p>\n<p>Toward the very bottom of the list &#8212; though still with above-average numbers &#8212; are global union federations like the IFJ (journalists), IMF (metal workers) and IUF (food workers), with ratings from 21-29. <\/p>\n<p>(The AWL rates higher than all of those, with a score of 33.)<\/p>\n<p>In general the global trade union movement isn&#8217;t nearly as influential &#8212; according to Klout &#8212; as national unions.  The International Trade Union Confederation, which represents 175 million workers, is rated as having less influence in social networks than LabourStart.<\/p>\n<p>Unions that use the net well are considered more influential by Klout than unions that have massive numbers of members.  So the tiny Industrial Workers of the World gets a high rating than the Canadian Auto Workers.  But in the real world, the CAW is a far more influential group than the IWW.<\/p>\n<p>Tools like Klout are going to get better, including more social networks (Linked In was only recently added).  Unions will also get better about signing up their members a subscribers to their Twitter feeds and as fans of their Facebook pages.  When that happens, the gap between real-world influence and online &#8220;klout&#8221; will shrink.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>It&#8217;s a corporate dream come true: imagine if a company could find out exactly which customers &#8211; and potential customers &#8211; could influence others. If one could identify with precision those consumers who influence others&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[13],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-512","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-solidarity"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ericlee.info\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/512","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ericlee.info\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ericlee.info\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ericlee.info\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ericlee.info\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=512"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.ericlee.info\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/512\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":513,"href":"https:\/\/www.ericlee.info\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/512\/revisions\/513"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ericlee.info\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=512"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ericlee.info\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=512"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ericlee.info\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=512"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}