{"id":119,"date":"2005-07-17T07:48:35","date_gmt":"2005-07-17T05:48:35","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.ericlee.info\/blog\/?p=119"},"modified":"2005-07-17T07:48:35","modified_gmt":"2005-07-17T05:48:35","slug":"77-provocation-or-genuine-terror-attack-the-two-views-of-george-galloways-respect-coalition","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.ericlee.info\/blog\/77-provocation-or-genuine-terror-attack-the-two-views-of-george-galloways-respect-coalition\/","title":{"rendered":"7\/7 &#8211; Provocation or genuine terror attack?  The two views of George Galloway&#8217;s Respect Coalition"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Under British law, political parties are obligated to inform us of the names of their major donors.  A visit to the website of the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.electoralcommission.gov.uk\/regulatory-issues\/regdpoliticalparties.cfm?ec=%7Bts%20%272005%2D07%2D17%2007%3A17%3A18%27%7D\">Electoral Commission<\/a> reveals that nearly half of the money donated to George Galloway&#8217;s Respect Party comes from one man, Dr Mohammed Naseem.  Google searches quickly reveal that Dr Naseem, in addition to having been a Respect candidate for Parliament, is also a leading figure in the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.islamicparty.com\/\">Islamic Party of Britain<\/a>.  And that party, whose website is largely dormant, did have some things to say about the recent terrorist bombings in London in <a href=\"http:\/\/www.mustaqim.co.uk\/ipb-archive\/commonsense\/london.htm\">a document<\/a> posted yesterday (16 July).<br \/>\nThat document, entitled &#8220;In Times of Terror the Truth takes a Tumble&#8221; makes the case that Islamic fundamentalists were not responsible for the terrorist bombings.  The reasons given include:<br \/>\n* They could not have been Islamic fundamentalists because one of them was &#8220;married to a Hindu lady&#8221;<br \/>\n* The Israeli politician Netanyahu was warned not to leave his hotel before the general public was informed that there had been a bombing &#8212; tipped off by the Mossad, which somehow knew what was really going on.<br \/>\n* Critical evidence, such as a CCTV camera on the number 30 bus, suspiciously disappeared from the scene.<br \/>\n* Finally, who benefits from the attacks?  Why the Blair government, of course!<br \/>\nThere is more, but here&#8217;s a typical sentence:<br \/>\n<i>&#8220;London needed a real terror attack in order to numb people sufficiently for the government to push through legislation that they had not been able to push through even before their electoral fiasco.&#8221;<\/i><br \/>\n(By &#8220;their electoral fiasco&#8221; the author means Labour&#8217;s unprecedented third straight election victory.)<br \/>\nThese are the views of Dr Mohammed Naseem&#8217;s organisation, the Islamic Party of Britain.  They were written by the party&#8217;s general secretary, Dr Sahib Mustaqim Bleher, a German-born convert to Islam.<br \/>\nContrast this with <a href=\"http:\/\/www.respectcoalition.com\/?ite=821\">what George Galloway told the House of Commons<\/a> on the very day of the attacks:<br \/>\n<i>&#8220;I condemn the act that was committed this morning. I have no need to speculate about its authorship. It is absolutely clear that Islamist extremists, inspired by the al-Qaeda world outlook, are responsible.&#8221;<\/i><br \/>\nDr Mohammed Naseem is a leading figure in the Respect Coalition.  He is its single largest donor, providing nearly 50% of the funds reported to the Electoral Commission.  He was a Respect candidate for Parliament in the general election.  The organisation he leads, the Islamic Party of Britain, is today saying that the attacks were a provocation, staged by the police, the Blair government, or the Mossad &#8212; or all of them together.<br \/>\nGeorge Galloway &#8212; do you stand by what you said in the House of Commons on 7 July, or do you share the views of your colleague Dr Naseem and his Islamic Party of Britain?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Under British law, political parties are obligated to inform us of the names of their major donors. A visit to the website of the Electoral Commission reveals that nearly half of the money donated to&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-119","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-web-exclusive"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ericlee.info\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/119","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ericlee.info\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ericlee.info\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ericlee.info\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ericlee.info\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=119"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.ericlee.info\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/119\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ericlee.info\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=119"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ericlee.info\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=119"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ericlee.info\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=119"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}