Having now completed reading the third in Sean Matgamna's series on Iraq, I want to return to a point he makes several times in the first of the series, the one published in early December in Solidarity.
In attempting to distinguish the views of the AWL from those of Labour Friends of Iraq (LFIQ), Sean makes use on several occasions of the word "Menshevik”.
He accuses Alan Johnson of "adopting the 'stages' approch of Menshevism and Stalinism" regarding Iraq. He adds:
"Think of those poor, benighted political 'idiots', the Bolsheviks, who in 1917 would not listen to the Mensheviks and SRs, or their own Bolshevik right wing, arguing that they needed to rally politically to the Provisional Government in order to prevent the victory of reaction."
Earlier in the article, he summarizes Menshevik strategy as "the working class should avoid doing anything that would frighten the bourgeoisie".
Though the logic of all this might not be clear to everyone, the obvious message is that to be a Bolshevik is a good thing and to be a Menshevik is a bad thing.
Continue reading "Menshevism in Iraq" »