" /> Eric Lee: July 2005 Archives

« May 2005 | Main | August 2005 »

July 26, 2005

The war on terror has reached my back-yard

It is late afternoon in North London. Behind my house, maybe 50 meters away, is the North Circular Road. Here, in this part of London, it's a six-lane highway. We tell people that we can hardly hear the sound of the trucks and cars as they pass, 24 hours a day. But right now we hear something we've never heard before: absolute silence.

The North Circular Road in this part of London has been shut down for several kilometres, stretching from Muswell Hill in the east to Golders Green in the west, by police. They have done so following the discovery of a white car, parked at a housing development called Strawberry Vale, a fifteen minute walk from my home. The white car was apparently used by at least one of the men suspected of involvement in last week's attempted suicide bomb attacks in London.

I decided to go outside and have a look. The first thing one notices is the silence. Then the kids. Kids walking, laughing, riding their bikes, photographing one another -- on the empty North Circular Road. Kids shouting to hear their voices for the first time without being drowned out by the sounds of traffic.

At one point, a police car comes speeding down the highway -- and I really mean speeding. I've never seen a car go so fast. A couple passes me, the man says to me, "wow". I nod.

There's a pedestrian overpass that connects my neighborhood to the one on the other side of the highway. People are standing in middle, talking, taking photos.

Three teenage girls are walking in the middle of the road, laughing, carrying on. One calls out to me, "Hello, mate!" Later I see the same girls standing on an overpass. They see a man walking down the road -- a man the British would describe as being "Asian". "Oy, fucking immigrant!" one shouts. The man pulls his hood even further over his face and passes underneath them.

I try to make it as far as the overpass from which I could get a view of the goings-on at Strawberry Vale, but the police have put up some tape. One lone officer stands guard, making sure no one gets through.

The war on terror has reached my backyard.

Many people I know have been touched by terrorism. Friends and family watched the World Trade Center burn and then collapse not on television, but from their rooftops. A first cousin was in one of the towers, but managed to get out before the building came down burying its thousands of victims.

I have friends who have experienced terror at first hand, a quarter century before the attacks of 11 September 2001. Terrorism didn't start with Al Qaeda. Does no one remember the Munich massacre, the killing of school children in Ma'alot, the Entebbe hostage-taking?

I lived through the Gulf War of 1991, spending night after night in a "sealed room" wearing a gas mask with my 9-year old son, Atropin needles at our side in case Saddam Hussein's Scud missiles were armed with nerve gas. To anyone who lived through that barrage, with dozens of Scuds fired at Israel -- a country not involved in the war to liberate Kuwait, the discussion of whether Saddam was or was not a terrorist or a friend to terrorists is laughable. Scud missiles fired at innocent civilians in a country you are not even at war with -- that's terrorism.

Here in Britain, journalists tend to write about "George Bush's war on terror" as if this is some kind of private conflict. (And as if John Kerry would not have continued the war.) The expression "war on terror" is nearly always put in quotation marks. British television recently showed a documentary program called "the power of nightmares" which argued, as Michael Moore does in the US, that there is no terrorist threat. It's just something the politicians made up. Well, that program was aired before 7 July, before 56 innocent Londoners were killed not by nightmares, but by real, actual Jihadi terrorists.

I write these words looking out the back window of my home, with the window open, and I hear the complete silence of the North Circular. That silence is reminder to me that the war on terror is very real, and it is closer than ever.

July 17, 2005

7/7 - Provocation or genuine terror attack? The two views of George Galloway's Respect Coalition

Under British law, political parties are obligated to inform us of the names of their major donors. A visit to the website of the Electoral Commission reveals that nearly half of the money donated to George Galloway's Respect Party comes from one man, Dr Mohammed Naseem. Google searches quickly reveal that Dr Naseem, in addition to having been a Respect candidate for Parliament, is also a leading figure in the Islamic Party of Britain. And that party, whose website is largely dormant, did have some things to say about the recent terrorist bombings in London in a document posted yesterday (16 July).

That document, entitled "In Times of Terror the Truth takes a Tumble" makes the case that Islamic fundamentalists were not responsible for the terrorist bombings. The reasons given include:

* They could not have been Islamic fundamentalists because one of them was "married to a Hindu lady"

* The Israeli politician Netanyahu was warned not to leave his hotel before the general public was informed that there had been a bombing -- tipped off by the Mossad, which somehow knew what was really going on.

* Critical evidence, such as a CCTV camera on the number 30 bus, suspiciously disappeared from the scene.

* Finally, who benefits from the attacks? Why the Blair government, of course!

There is more, but here's a typical sentence:

"London needed a real terror attack in order to numb people sufficiently for the government to push through legislation that they had not been able to push through even before their electoral fiasco."

(By "their electoral fiasco" the author means Labour's unprecedented third straight election victory.)

These are the views of Dr Mohammed Naseem's organisation, the Islamic Party of Britain. They were written by the party's general secretary, Dr Sahib Mustaqim Bleher, a German-born convert to Islam.

Contrast this with what George Galloway told the House of Commons on the very day of the attacks:

"I condemn the act that was committed this morning. I have no need to speculate about its authorship. It is absolutely clear that Islamist extremists, inspired by the al-Qaeda world outlook, are responsible."

Dr Mohammed Naseem is a leading figure in the Respect Coalition. He is its single largest donor, providing nearly 50% of the funds reported to the Electoral Commission. He was a Respect candidate for Parliament in the general election. The organisation he leads, the Islamic Party of Britain, is today saying that the attacks were a provocation, staged by the police, the Blair government, or the Mossad -- or all of them together.

George Galloway -- do you stand by what you said in the House of Commons on 7 July, or do you share the views of your colleague Dr Naseem and his Islamic Party of Britain?

July 16, 2005

Unite against terror

I have added my name to this statement. I encourage all readers of this blog to do so as well.

July 12, 2005

A very short open letter to George Galloway, MP

Dear Sir:

Last week, following the attacks in London, you wrote:

"No one can condone acts of violence aimed at working people going about their daily lives. They have not been a party to, nor are they responsible for, the decisions of their government. They are entirely innocent and we condemn those who have killed or injured them."

Today a suicide bomber killed two women and injured 24 others in an attack on a shopping mall in Netanya, Israel.

Do you condemn the attack in Netanya today?

I look forward to receiving your reply, which I will publish on the web.

Eric Lee

July 08, 2005

Ed McBain

Ed McBain has died of cancer at the age of 78.

I discovered his books relatively late in life, nearly 20 years ago. And then I read through them one by one, all the books of his 87th Precinct series and his Matthew Hope series and then the books he wrote under his "real" name, Evan Hunter, as well.

I don't think there's another author who has given me so many hours of reading pleasure.

A couple of years ago, I heard that he would be coming to London to read from his new book at the time. I found his website, emailed him, and instantly received a personal response. He told me to stop by Borders Books on Oxford Street when he was due to make an appearance, and to introduce myself.

I did so -- I began by saying that he'd told me to introduce myself and he replied "Are you Eric?"

This was before his reading -- he had come early, with his wife, and we sat and chatted for maybe ten minutes before he was called up to do his reading.

Ed McBain invented the police procedural. He is one of the finest writers of crime fiction who ever lived. He certainly belongs to same league as Raymond Chandler and Dashiel Hammett.

Amazingly, he had just begun writing a new series of books, and a glance at his upcoming, not yet published books at Amazon.com shows just how amazingly prolific he was, despite his throat cancer.

He will be sorely missed.

***

Click here to buy Ed McBain's books

Terror attacks on London

Thanks to all of you who wrote in asking if we were alright.

I don't want to add my own voice just yet to the many who have already written about this, but let me just refer you all to two excellent websites which contain many postings that are quite similar to the way I am feeling right now:

Harry's Place

and

Labour Friends of Iraq

July 04, 2005

Every six minutes

When LabourStart began back in 1998, news was one of its three main features (the others were a directory of union websites and links to online campaigns run by unions). One of the three columns on the website consisted of the day's labour news -- all five or six items. I remember well a discussion I had with a colleague that year who told me that in the future, we should probably stick with that format -- five or six news stories a day was more than enough.

Fast forward to 2005: We've just had to completely re-vamp LabourStart's front page because the number of news stories appearing in English on the average day had become so large as to require endless scrolling. If you were looking for news from the USA or the UK, you'd have to scroll through pages and pages of news from all the other countries, listed in alphabetical order.

In the month of June 2005, our 340 volunteer correspondents published no fewer than 7,300 links to labour news stories -- an average of 243 news stories per day, every day. Let's put that another way: on average, every six minutes we link to another labour news story.

Not all those stories were in English. We're running news in around 20 languages these days. But the bulk of those were stories in English.

Some of those stories are purely local, of course. A report on a picket line at a Chicago hotel. A woman fined for driving into a picket line in Canada. A seminar of interest to trade unionists in Sydney.

But many were of global significance -- big news stories by any standard. These included hundreds of thousands of workers taking to the streets in one of the largest protest movements Australia has ever seen. General strikes in South Africa and Greece. In the USA, a possible split in the AFL-CIO. And in Israel, the militant leader of the country's unions running as a candidate for prime minister.

With labour news breaking every six minutes, you'd think that daily newspapers, radio stations and television would be absolutely overflowing with union news. But of course that is not the case. You can read through many major daily newspapers in the USA and elsewhere and never find a single news story that relates in any way to a union. You can watch hours of 24-hour news channels such as Fox or CNN (not that you'd want to!) and never hear the word "union" mentioned.

It's a funny situation when LabourStart is flooded with thousands of union news stories every month, but in the mass media there's a drought. Of the 7,300 labour news stories we ran in June 2005, I'll bet that at most a handful appeared in any of the mainstream media you've read.

But it's not only the mainstream media which are the problem. Which union publication can cover any of those 7,300 stories in real time? There are no labour daily papers in the USA (and very few anywhere else), and most unions would consider themselves lucky to publish a monthly magazine. Newspapers like Industrial Worker which do make an effort to publish general labour news find that at best there'll be room for a dozen or two labour news stories -- and these will appear days or weeks after the event.

All of this leads me to three observations about labour news and the labour movement:

1. The only way to get labour news out to union members in real time is through the web. Print publications and even other electronic media (radio and television) cannot keep up with the pace.

2. Labor news is global news. National borders mean less and less in a globalized economy.

3. The mainstream media isn't going to do the job for us. Unions need their own media.

The next time you sit down to watch the news on television, or skim through the morning newspaper, pay attention to how much (or how little) labour news you're seeing or reading. And then remember that every six minutes, another labour news story breaks somewhere in the world.